Monday, June 15, 2009

Natural Gas Production, Use, Storage, & Price Analysis


(photo by sidewalk flying's)

On a post last week looking at crude oil, gasoline, fuel oil, and natural gas prices, I made the statement that natural gas did not correlate to crude oil like the others, there seemed to be something else going on with natural gas prices so I wanted to look further. EIA has a ton of great historical data on various energy sources.

Natural Gas Balance of Supply and Demand:

I will start by showing an interesting perspective of the supply and demand of U.S. natural gas over time since 2001:


What is immediately apparent is the strong seasonality of demand which makes perfect sense as much more natural gas is used in the winter months. "Supply" here is the sum of U.S. production plus imports minus exports. Recently the U.S. imports about 16% of the natural gas supply. Note that on an instantaneous basis there is not enough gas supply in the winter months to keep up with demand. This situation makes storage capability critical.

Natural Gas Storage Capacity Utilization

Natural gas reserves are typically stored underground in natural geologic reservoirs such as hollowed out salt domes, and depleted oil and gas fields. A fairly large amount (~65%) of the total storage volume is not usable. This base volume is needed for maintaining working pressure and for other process needs. The "working volume" is the amount really usable as recoverable storage. The plot below shows both total storage volume and working volume both as a % of total storage capacity over time since 2001.



Strong seasonality here which obviously follows from the seasonality in demand shown above. Storage hits a high in October and a low in March. Working storage typically gets above 80% in October and then falls to 40% or less in March. You can imaging what would happen should the working storage levels get near 0% with winter months remaining.

Natural Gas Price and Storage Volume Utilization

Below is a plot showing the price of natural gas and the working storage % utilization since 1992. There appears to be a relationship of inadequate stores in October leading to spikes in natural gas prices into the winter months. I drew a somewhat arbitrary line at 80% working storage and noted in blue filled circles Octobers which peaked below 80%. (click on any of the charts for a larger view)



Doing a rough eyeball analysis, I count 5 out of 6 occurrence of less than 80% working storage in October followed by a winter price spike in natural gas price (the p-value of this observation is 0.1 which is short of the typically 0.05 statistical significance). The rough average of the price spikes are 50% to 75% increases over the few months following October. Also note that the two largest storage shortfalls in 1996 and 2000 were followed by especially large price spikes. Also shown on the chart is the 2005 record hurricane season which had a price spike as well when natural gas production capacity was impacted in the gulf from hurricane Katrina and Rita. One final observation is the low point of storage in March. When that is especially low (which often follows a low October level of course) the price spike seems especially large. So this all makes good logical sense to me. Here is how I would summarize it:
  1. The lack of natural gas supply to be able to keep up with winter demand on an instantaneous basis makes natural gas storage critical.
  2. When the peak storage level in October is not high enough it suggests that winter supply may get tight...
  3. Which leads to a winter price spike which can increase natural gas price by more than 50% and it peaks between November and February.
  4. Hurricane or other major supply interruptions can cause a price spike for similar reasons. Hurricane price impacts are actually quite rare however, for a nice analysis see this.
  5. This does not consider the impact of crude oil prices however which is also a strong effect especially evident last year. I will look at natural gas vs. crude oil more soon.

Natural Gas Price Forecast for 2009/2010 Winter

Based on this analysis, it is really too early to forecast for this next winter. However, the low storage inventory was just put in in March at 39% which is relatively high and April and May are trending quite high compared to historical norms. The EIA's June Outlook is projecting this October to be a record high inventory level. EIA is looking at absolute storage volume, not % of storage capacity which I looked at here. Plus, I think it is too early to make a call for this October. If you look at the above you will see that high levels at the low in March are not always predictive of high peak inventory levels in October. The other unknown as far as price is the effect of higher crude oil prices. There has been a growing gap as crude oil price has gone up in recent months and natural gas has not. I think this gap will be closed in the next 3-6 months. But that closing of the gap could be done through either natural gas price rising or crude oil price falling or some combination of the two. I will take a closer look at natural gas vs. crude oil in posts coming soon.

So bottom line, I think it is looking like natural gas won't have an inventory derived price spike this winter but it really is too early to tell. Hurricanes and crude oil still could cause natural gas prices to go up as well. The former is probably a long shot and the latter quite possible. I will update this forecast in a couple of months once natural gas storage inventories are further along.
...

10 comments:

  1. You did a very good job teasing out the fundamentals here. A couple points you might have missed:

    -the US has had a revolution in NG production called 'shale'. :-) This has lead to increasing production, much of which was hedged forward at last year's high prices

    -there is a limit to how much gas can be stored. We have never hit that limit....but we are going to this year in some places for sure, if not in total.

    -LNG has about 7 diversion points before you have to take it to the US and dump it, as the US is the last place for LNG to land. If Europe does ok on their gas, the LNG will land here and make things even worse.

    -The UNG ETF has had massive volume flow into it over the last few weeks, probably from naive investors who do not realize the fundamentals, nor their exposure is limited to the prompt month and subject to monthly roll decay.

    So bottom line...NG probably *will* have an inventory-induced price spike..but not the way you think.
    ReplyDelete
  2. If you want to find something else interesting, take a look at the hourly or 15-minute charts on *Thursdays*. That's when the weekly EIA storage number comes out; look around the 9:30am time frame. Every week this generates furious trading action based on the actual number versus market expectations.
    ReplyDelete
  3. Good stuff Cavedawg. This (and the above commenter's comment) both solidify my view that UNG is not "Jacksonian Caliber" due to it's innate unpredictability, not to mention seasonality.

    Jacksons should not need to be hedged.
    ReplyDelete
  4. Anon 1,

    Great comments. Thanks. I had thought about the inventory issue of if we run out of storage capacity as demand grows and can't store as much as needed in the winter then it could one year result in a massive price spike.

    The surge in volume in UNG has been amazing and enticing to me looking at it but there is something about it that looks too good.

    Anon 2,

    Good idea, I will have to check out the Thursday inventory data release. I don't really trade on that time scale but it would be interesting to watch.

    Jake,

    I agree UNG does not fit your Jacksonian portfolio probably. Especially because I would not be a long term holder of UNG. Although I do think it would add some much needed real diversification.
    ReplyDelete
  5. The seasonality of NG is not an issue in terms of the UNG ETF. There will be some natural variations in the term structure, for example: April is often backwardated to March even if the overall complex is in contango. But that doesn't really matter as UNG's goal is to hold the prompt month and expose their investors to the price movements in *that* specific contract. Those movements take place across the entire complex, so the seasonaity is not really an issue. NG traders know well about injection season, withdrawal season, etc.

    Re: the storage, this is a real issue on the fundies side because there isn't a whole lot the US can do w/ excess gas. Power production spark spreads are not incentive for displacing coal in most ISO's, and industrial demand is basically non-existent, so that leaves maybe flaring...which would be crazy. Ultimately a liquifaction terminal (as opposed to all the re-gassification terminals we built) would probably become a good idea as the US could/should have the ability to export LNG rather than just be a taker.
    ReplyDelete
  6. To give you an example of the 'Thursday' effect, at 10:30 EST today to 10:34, about 1 million in volume in the spot traded on ICE. High frequency plus stops getting hit all combine to make intense action.
    ReplyDelete
  7. I was watching. Thanks for the heads up. You can see it in the intraday on UNG, it tanked right as the inventory numbers came out and were higher than expected.
    ReplyDelete
  8. Hmmmm. I think you all overlook one point that looks most significant to me: development of new gas fields is currently halted. As far as I read, producers are mostly keeping up their existing infrastructure because it would cost them more to shut them down now -- so they are forced to sell at low prices right now, ie. until these rigs run out of ammo (gas).

    The result of that is everyone's guess.
    ReplyDelete
  9. Mark,

    I don't disagree but I think that what you are talking about is a longer term phenomena. But should they start to run out then the inventory trends as shown here should pick up on it as that happens, so far, for this year inventory is strong but it really is too early to tell.
    ReplyDelete
  10. "...development of new gas fields being halted." Let's say a field is being drilled out, and drilling stops. What happens then is that there are no new wells replacing the production of tired old wells. At some point, operators will be faced with a situation where all they have is old wells. Production starts falling off pretty quick on the average well.

    Yes, Mark, I think people are thinking about this factor.
    ReplyDelete